SOLUTIONS
Review exceptions, not questionnaires.
TrustVendor extracts answers from documents vendors already published, so your team spends time on gaps and exceptions — not on chasing SOC 2 reports and filling in spreadsheet rows.
“I spend three weeks per vendor collecting the same documents I collected last year. Nothing changed, but I still have to chase everyone for updated copies.”
— what we hear from TPRM teams
“Our assessment process is designed around what vendors are willing to share, not around the actual risk questions we need answered.”
— what we hear from TPRM teams
“By the time I finish an annual review cycle, the first vendor I assessed has already changed their subprocessor list twice.”
— what we hear from TPRM teams
Jobs to be done
What TPRM Analysts and Program Managers use TrustVendor to accomplish.
01
Review exceptions, not tickets.
When a vendor's subprocessor page changes, TrustVendor fires a signal with the exact diff — which entity was added, which jurisdiction it operates in, and whether your SCCs cover the new geography. You triage a single exception, not a full assessment. The rest of your vendor register continues monitoring automatically.
02
Start assessments with evidence already filled in.
TrustVendor pre-populates assessment templates from documents vendors have already published on their trust centres. Your team reviews the gaps — the questions a vendor's public evidence did not answer — rather than re-documenting things that are already in a SOC 2 report or a published DPA.
03
Replace the spreadsheet with a ranked risk register.
The portfolio view shows every vendor sorted by residual risk to your data — not alphabetically, not by contract value, but by what actually matters given the data classes and integration depth you share with each vendor. High-risk vendors surface to the top without manual scoring.
04
Build an audit-ready evidence archive automatically.
Every vendor claim in TrustVendor links to the exact character span in a hash-verified, immutable snapshot of the source document. When your auditor asks to see evidence that a vendor holds a current SOC 2, you share a link — not a PDF that may have been modified — and the hash verification runs client-side.
Product mapping
Your workflow, mapped to TrustVendor.
| Your workflow | TrustVendor surface |
|---|---|
| Annual vendor assessment | TPRM Workspace — assessments |
| Exception triage when something changes | Signals & Lifecycle |
| Evidence request to a vendor | TPRM Workspace — evidence requests |
| Vendor risk ranking for program leadership | TPRM Workspace — portfolio by residual risk |
| Auditor evidence package | Evidence Viewer |
| Cross-portfolio question ("which vendors process PHI without a current BAA?") | Agents & Q&A |
In the field
“TrustVendor found a subprocessor change our quarterly review would have missed by three months. That is the kind of thing that creates a HIPAA breach notification.”
Cut vendor review time from 3 weeks to 2 days by replacing spreadsheet questionnaires with automated evidence extraction.
Read the case study →Common questions.
How is this different from our current questionnaire tool?
How do we handle vendors that do not have a trust centre?
Can TrustVendor replace our GRC platform?
How do signal-driven reviews work in practice?
How long does it take to onboard a vendor register?
Run a risk program, not an assessment factory.
Book a 30-minute demo. We will show you what TrustVendor already knows about vendors in your register — no data entry required.
- Pre-populated assessments from vendors' own published documents
- Signal-driven reviews replace calendar-driven cycles
- Full audit trail with hash-verified evidence for every claim