Security ratings
TrustVendor vs Bitsight
Bitsight rates vendors 250–900 using internet telemetry from sinkholes, botnet sensors, and internet-wide scanning.
Where Bitsight is strong
Genuinely differentiated sensor network; the external hygiene signal is real and hard to replicate.
Where it falls short
One number for every customer regardless of what data they share with the vendor. Score moves without explanation. Attribution errors are the most common enterprise complaint.
How TrustVendor differs
Common questions
Should I replace Bitsight with TrustVendor?
For most organizations, the answer is no — at least not initially. Bitsight's external telemetry signal is real and worth keeping. The fastest sale is coexistence: keep Bitsight for what it does well, add TrustVendor for document-based evidence, change detection, and relationship-aware scoring. Many customers run both.
How does TrustVendor handle the same vendors Bitsight already rates?
TrustVendor monitors the same vendor population through a different signal set: trust centres, subprocessor pages, SOC 2 reports, SEC filings, CT logs, and regulatory disclosures. Where Bitsight asks "what does this vendor's internet footprint look like?", TrustVendor asks "what does this vendor claim in writing, is it backed by evidence, and what changed?" Both questions matter.
Can TrustVendor ingest my Bitsight data?
Yes. TrustVendor accepts external scores as signals, so your Bitsight rating appears alongside TrustVendor's posture and assurance scores as one of many inputs. This means the score you already pay for becomes part of a richer picture rather than being abandoned.
See what evidence-grade looks like
Book a 30-minute session. We'll run a live diff on one of your vendors and show you what changed since your last review.
Book a demo