TPRM + ratings
TrustVendor vs Panorays
Panorays combines automated security assessments with questionnaire automation, positioning on relationship-aware risk.
Where Panorays is strong
Relationship context is built into the product story, which is closer to the right problem.
Where it falls short
The evidence substrate is questionnaire responses rather than document extraction. Evidence decays implicitly, not on an explicit curve.
How TrustVendor differs
Eight dimensions.
Every one, cited.
Common questions
Honest answers.
Should I replace Panorays with TrustVendor?
For most organizations, the answer is no — at least not initially. Panorays's workflow features complement TrustVendor's evidence layer. The fastest sale is coexistence: keep Panorays for what it does well, add TrustVendor for document-based evidence, change detection, and relationship-aware scoring. Many customers run both.
How does TrustVendor handle the same vendors Panorays already rates?
TrustVendor monitors the same vendor population through a different signal set: trust centres, subprocessor pages, SOC 2 reports, SEC filings, CT logs, and regulatory disclosures. Where Panorays asks "what does this vendor's internet footprint look like?", TrustVendor asks "what does this vendor claim in writing, is it backed by evidence, and what changed?" Both questions matter.
Can TrustVendor ingest my Panorays data?
Yes. TrustVendor accepts external scores as signals, so your Panorays rating appears alongside TrustVendor's posture and assurance scores as one of many inputs. This means the score you already pay for becomes part of a richer picture rather than being abandoned.
Live diff
See what evidence-grade
looks like.
Book a 30-minute session. We’ll run a live diff on one of your vendors and show you what changed since your last review.